If constitutional monarch you could have choice of a referendum on who will be king in these places while absolutist Carlist can pick whoever they likeīy 1836 Spain was a hollow husk of its former self. If a constitutional monarchy then these positions could largely be symbolic figureheads while more Carlist absolutist regime would see them these positions have good amount of power. The title being “Emperor of Hispania” while monarch of Spain still exist along with new titles for like King of New Spain, King of New Granada, and King of Peru. Maybe have decision to create an imperial estates or Parliament along with offering new titles especially if you unite Iberia on top of it. The rest are more options between creating new viceroyalties or integrate indirectly into Spain more so.īasically, an imperial federal structure. Viceroyalties like New Spain, New Granada, and Peru. This opens up a long political chain of events on restructuring the reunited Spanish or “Hispania” Empire. The Carlist route does the opposite.Įither way your left with choice either keep privilege statuses of Iberians or concede equal leverage within Empire to creoles in Americas and maybe mestizos and assimilated creolized natives as well if liberal constitutional regime. In the Americas this attract more mestizos allies and support while alienating some conservative creoles. The constitutional monarchy appealing to more moderates and liberals on both sides of the Atlantic. One is more “democratic” or “liberal” route. Either way opens up political tools for reconquest of former holdings in Americas. A absolutist Carlist regime or more British style constitutional monarchy by defeating them. You have two main routes to choice from at start.

I am going to use monarch route for example especially given first and second Mexican Empire along with Creole(whites or mix people that “pass” as such).

Her interactive forum